Back to HRC homepage

 

HRC Meeting Notes for March 2000

Present: Olga Bachilova, Eric Breitkreutz, Matthew Bronski, Nick Brooks, Stacey Darrow, Ann DiLucia, David Fixler, Jack Glassman, Brian Knight, Kim Konrad, Laura Mackowiak, Doug Manley, Colleen Meagher, Ivan Myjer, Robert G. Neiley, Stephanie Reinert, Albert Rex, Deborah Robinson, Susan Schur, Jonathan Smith, Bob Thomas, Sara Wermiel, and Luke Young.

In Henry Moss's absence, Matthew Bronski prepared the agenda and led the meeting; Sara Wermiel took notes and prepared the minutes.

 1. BSA Historic Preservation Award: Matthew Bronski asked for recommendations for this award. Robert Neiley proposed the Motor Mart. Albert Rex suggested the Chart House, which the lessees have spent a lot to stabilize. More proposals are welcome. We should make a decision during the summer.

2. Report on the HRC Bridge Committee: Sara Wermiel reported that the subcommittee met March 2. It decided that its first project will be preparing a position paper and a guide to Boston's historic bridges, perhaps modeled on the "Map and Guide, Notable Buildings in Boston and Cambridge" that the HRC produced in 1992. The purpose of the guide and paper will be to increase public awareness of the city's historic bridges. Matthew Bronski invited HRC members to take a picture of their favorite bridges and explain what's appealing about them; these photos might be used in the guide. Robert Neiley recommended an article in the Boston on the Northern Avenue Bridge (don't know the date) and Susan Schur mentioned an article on the history of the Tobin Bridge (Boston 03/06/2000, B2, with a photo). Albert Rex said that bridges, and how to protect and reuse them, have become a central focus at the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Many of the legal cases the Trust is dealing with today concern bridges; the HRC bridge project, therefore, seems very timely.

Note: On March 21, Chris Lydon's radio call-in show on WBUR, "The Connection," had a program on the controversy over expanding traffic lanes at the Peace Bridge between Buffalo and Fort Erie, Canada. To increase capacity, a joint U.S./Canadian bridge authority decided to build a companion span, like the existing steel truss bridge, because (among other reasons) the ~70-year old bridge is historic. Lydon's main guest, bridge engineer Eugene Figg, ridiculed the absurd idea of retaining an ugly, obsolete bridge. Lydon himself clearly hadn't given the topic any thought, and the discussion degenerated into an uninformative shouting match between a few locals (mainly Canadians) who think the existing bridge is fine, and the guest, who advocates a new "signature" bridge (such as the plan by architect Bruno Freschi and bridge designer T. Y. Lin, who have proposed a single-pylon, cabled-stayed, curved segmental concrete bridge). No guest or caller addressed whether the existing bridge is historic and should be preserved on these grounds (rather than simply because it's there). There's an interesting divergence in national attitudes towards government agencies (Canadians defer to the bridge authority, Americans don't). In case the site is still up, for more information see: http://www.wbur.org/connection/archive/2000/03/0321b.shtml

For an informative article about the controversy, with more links, see,http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~bjackson/otherside.htm

3. Save Fenway Park: Kim Konrad reported on the efforts to preserve Fenway Park. Various groups, including the new Coalition Against State Subsidy (CASS), MassPIRG, and Citizens for Limited Taxation have joined to oppose taxpayer subsidy for a new stadium. CASS delivered copies of Neil deMause and Joanna Cagan's book, Field of Schemes, to lawmakers at the state house and city hall. The book argues that the public subsidies for constructing new sports facilities enrich team owners but give no commensurate benefits to cities and taxpayers. Fenway Park's supporters are trying to get it put on the National Trust's most endangered list. Kim requested a letter of support for this from the HRC (Sara Wermiel suggested she forward information about it to Henry Moss). There's also a new player on the scene working for the owners: George Mitchell. See his op-ed piece 3/9/2000 in the Boston , "Keeping the Red Sox competitive."

Kim noted that plans for a new Fenway Park have gone forward without input from the neighborhood and that neighbors by and large oppose a new stadium, because it would foreclose opportunities to redevelop the area in ways the neighbors favor. A new neighborhood group, Urban Village Coalition, made up of local residents, plans to have a mini-charrette, to get people involved. Kim distributed the Save Fenway Park! newsletter.

4. Opera House: Albert Rex reported that the developers met with the abutters (Tremont on the Common tenants are the most vocal opponents) and have tried to be responsive. They have scaled down the rear extension to create a 10-foot passageway and offered to pay for Tremont on the Common's trash removal. The BRA will hear the case on March 30 and if it approves the developers' plans, ToC will probably sue. This is bad, because time is running out for the building: the roof is in worse shape than the developers thought, so the delay of a lawsuit could be a death sentence for it. Boston Preservation Alliance plans to write an op-ed piece for the Boston to stress the importance of saving the building.

5. Appleton Mills, Lowell: Matthew Bronski described the background of the current threat to this group of industrial buildings in Lowell and said that to his knowledge, the Lowell city council has dropped the idea of redrawing the boundary of the National Historical Park to exclude this site. But the danger to the buildings persists, including the pressure to take them down because they are viewed as fire hazards.

Albert Rex said that Historic Massachusetts will organize a meeting on fire safety and historic buildings. There was some discussion on the topic of fire safety and historic buildings - how to help firefighters avoid danger (i.e., marking buildings so firefighters can know their conditions before entering) and whether firefighters are sufficiently acquainted with historic building construction to work effectively yet sensitively (divergent views were expressed).

6. DoCoMoMo: David Fixler said the group was trying to put together a local and regional registry of buildings; they made a presentation on modern movement buildings to Massachusetts Historical Commission. They are planning a tour of TAC houses in May and a lecture on Louis Kahn. They meet monthly (next one is March 20). An international registry book is being planned, as is a conference in Brazil, and they are in discussions with ICOMOS and UNESCO, urging them to take modern movement buildings more seriously.

7. Other business: Matthew noted that tours will resume when the weather improves and that weekends seem to be better for people than weekdays. Possible tours are a Gusatavino in Boston tour (visiting examples of Guastavino tile work here) and a MASS MoCA tour. A conference on architectural terra cotta will be held in New York, April 8, at Columbia University, organized by the New York Landmarks Conservancy. Luke Young seeks a letter of support from the HRC for a nomination to the National Trust Honor Award that a non-profit organization RPRN (Recent Past Resource Network) is making to recognize the work of Perry Dean Rogers & Partners and Mass. Institute of Technology for Alvar Aalto's Baker House renovation and restoration. This request was referred to Henry Moss. David Fixler has a new job with the Boston office of Einhorn Yaffee & Prescott but will retain some connection to the Baker House project at MIT.

There was tremendous interest in having a listserv for the HRC. Sara Wermiel has been busy figuring out the best way to set one up.

Meetings you may have missed:

New England Chapter of the Vernacular Architecture Forum, Winter Meeting, March 25, 2000; "New England's 18th-Century Building Practices: Examining and Synthesizing the Evidence."

Coming events:

Rhode Island Statewide Historic Preservation Conference, April 8, 2000: "Preserving Our Cultural Heritage: The Meaning of Place and Culture." Includes a session "Historic Rehab & Public Safety" that is supposed to explain New Jersey's rehab code.

Next Meeting

8: 00 a.m., Thursday, April 13, 2000

The Architects' Building

52 Broad Street, Boston, Fifth Floor